Virtual currency fraud lawyer
Publish: 2021-05-12 22:05:01
1. virtual currency is also converted from RMB
report to the police with evidence in case of fraud
fraud is a criminal case
the police will investigate and screen
in case of fraud, the police will actively solve the case
if the case is solved, the victim's loss will be recovered.
report to the police with evidence in case of fraud
fraud is a criminal case
the police will investigate and screen
in case of fraud, the police will actively solve the case
if the case is solved, the victim's loss will be recovered.
2. Report to the public security organ. According to the information you have, provide clues as detailed as possible. You will be investigated for this kind of illegal crime. If your report is true, you may be given a certain reward for encouragement
3.
It is not likely that the public security organ will file a case of virtual currency transaction fraud, because the virtual currency transaction fraud generally involves a large number of people, a wide range, a small amount and strong anonymity
it is difficult for the public security organs to collect evidence and arrest, because most of the information of the Chuangshi operation team of the virtual currency scam is not public and there is no way to collect evidence. Maybe the mastermind will become a victim after being arrested
with the popularity of virtual currency, disputes related to it appear frequently. Recently, the people's Court of Futian District in Shenzhen tried a dispute caused by investment in virtual currency. The court reminded that the investment transaction of virtual currency is not protected by law, and investors should keep sober and rational
extended information:
after the judicial organ reviews the criminal cases or civil disputes, it is the beginning stage of litigation activities that the judicial organ decides to list them as litigation cases for investigation or trial. Generally, it includes criminal cases, administrative cases and civil cases
According to the criminal procere law of the people's Republic of China, there are two conditions for filing a case:1
The criminal responsibility should be investigated according to law. If there are criminal facts, but the law stipulates that criminal responsibility should not be investigated, the case shall not be filedunder any of the following circumstances, no criminal responsibility shall be investigated and no case shall be filed; If the case has been investigated, the case shall be annulled, or no prosecution shall be instituted, or acquitted
(1) if the circumstances are obviously minor and the harm is not great, it is not considered a crime (2) the time limit for prosecution has expired (3) exemption from punishment by special amnesty (4) in the case of criminal law, it is a crime to be told, but it is not told or withdrawn (5) the defendant has died (6) other laws and regulations provide for exemption from criminal responsibility4. 1. Although network virtual currency can not be completely equivalent to money and other traditional property, in specific occasions, the perpetrator can achieve the criminal purpose of illegally obtaining other people's property through the possession of virtual currency. Therefore, the fraud of virtual currency may also endanger the property safety of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, which has considerable social harmfulness and should also be punished as a crime
2, if the public security organs suspect the criminal detention, the procuratorate can not approve the arrest, they should apply for l pending trial. Bail pending trial also goes through the court
the seventy-seventh provision of the criminal procere law stipulates that the people's court, the people's Procuratorate and the public security organ shall not exceed twelve months for the suspect and defendant to be l, and the longest residence shall not exceed six months.
ring the period of l pending trial and residential surveillance, the investigation, prosecution and trial of the case shall not be interrupted. If it is found that criminal responsibility should not be investigated or the term of l pending trial or residential surveillance has expired, the l pending trial or residential surveillance shall be lifted in time. In case of cancellation of l pending trial or residential surveillance, the person who has been led pending trial or residential surveillance and the relevant units shall be informed in time.
2, if the public security organs suspect the criminal detention, the procuratorate can not approve the arrest, they should apply for l pending trial. Bail pending trial also goes through the court
the seventy-seventh provision of the criminal procere law stipulates that the people's court, the people's Procuratorate and the public security organ shall not exceed twelve months for the suspect and defendant to be l, and the longest residence shall not exceed six months.
ring the period of l pending trial and residential surveillance, the investigation, prosecution and trial of the case shall not be interrupted. If it is found that criminal responsibility should not be investigated or the term of l pending trial or residential surveillance has expired, the l pending trial or residential surveillance shall be lifted in time. In case of cancellation of l pending trial or residential surveillance, the person who has been led pending trial or residential surveillance and the relevant units shall be informed in time.
5. If the amount of fraud reaches the standard of the crime of fraud, it is a criminal case
according to the interpretation of the Supreme People's court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues concerning the specific application of law in handling criminal cases of fraud, the standard of "large amount" (i.e. filing standard) is to defraud public and private property worth 3000 yuan to 10000 yuan or more. The specific amount of the starting point of punishment is more clearly stipulated in various localities.
according to the interpretation of the Supreme People's court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues concerning the specific application of law in handling criminal cases of fraud, the standard of "large amount" (i.e. filing standard) is to defraud public and private property worth 3000 yuan to 10000 yuan or more. The specific amount of the starting point of punishment is more clearly stipulated in various localities.
6. It should
7. Receipts for purchases, phone records, telephone numbers, online remittance certificates of deposit, bank remittance bills are all information used by the police. The police will crack the case and look for evidence. You just need to call the police
8. If the online virtual game currency swindles 4000 yuan, it is suspected of fraud and shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years< According to the interpretation of the Supreme People's court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues concerning the specific application of law in handling criminal cases of fraud, which came into effect on April 8, 2011, those who defraud public or private property with a value of 3000 yuan to 10000 yuan or more, 30000 yuan to 100000 yuan or more, and 500000 yuan or more will be punished, It should be respectively identified as "large amount" and "huge amount" and "especially huge amount" stipulated in Article 266 of the criminal law< Article 266 of the criminal law stipulates that whoever swindles public or private property, if the amount is relatively large, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and shall also, or shall only, be fined; If the amount is huge or if there are other serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than 10 years and shall also be fined; If the amount is especially huge or if there are other especially serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment and shall also be fined or have his property confiscated. Where there are other provisions in this law, such provisions shall prevail.
9. 1. Possible scope of infringement
the patent law stipulates that the scope of protection of a patent right for invention or utility model shall be subject to the content of the claim, and the description and drawings can be used to explain the content of the claim
the interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the application of law in the trial of patent infringement disputes stipulates that the people's court shall examine all the technical features recorded in the claims claimed by the obligee when deciding whether the infringed technical solution falls within the scope of patent protection, The people's court shall determine that it falls within the scope of patent protection; If, compared with all the technical features recorded in the claims, the technical features of the sued infringing technical scheme lack more than one of the technical features recorded in the claims, or more than one of the technical features are not the same or the same, the people's court shall determine that it does not fall into the scope of protection of the patent right
it can be seen from the above provisions that if a proct is identified as infringement in the patent document, it must cover all the technical features recorded in the claim. Therefore, in order to obtain a larger scope of protection, the less content in the claim, the better, that is, do not add unnecessary content
the innovation of blockchain is usually associated with multiple executors, which is a systematic scheme that needs the cooperation of all parties. For example, if the data publishing node, blockchain network, authorization node, etc. are combined in a claim, it will be found that when the patentee wants to sue an executor for infringement, the party does not cover all the contents of the claim (at least not other executors), which leads to that although the party uses the innovative idea of the patent, it does not infringe. Therefore, in a claim, it is better to write the scope of protection around an executor< According to the patent law, except as otherwise provided in this law, no entity or indivial may exploit its patent without the permission of the patentee, that is, it may not manufacture, use, promise to sell, sell or import its patented procts, or use its patented methods, or use, sell or import its patented procts for proction and business purposes Promise to sell, sell and import the procts directly obtained according to the patented method
here we should pay attention to "for the purpose of proction and operation", that is to say, not for the purpose of implementation, no infringement. Therefore, when writing the claims, we should also consider who the potential infringement objects are, and the content of the patent right should limit them as far as possible, instead of including unnecessary objects (such as the devices used by the end consumers).
the patent law stipulates that the scope of protection of a patent right for invention or utility model shall be subject to the content of the claim, and the description and drawings can be used to explain the content of the claim
the interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the application of law in the trial of patent infringement disputes stipulates that the people's court shall examine all the technical features recorded in the claims claimed by the obligee when deciding whether the infringed technical solution falls within the scope of patent protection, The people's court shall determine that it falls within the scope of patent protection; If, compared with all the technical features recorded in the claims, the technical features of the sued infringing technical scheme lack more than one of the technical features recorded in the claims, or more than one of the technical features are not the same or the same, the people's court shall determine that it does not fall into the scope of protection of the patent right
it can be seen from the above provisions that if a proct is identified as infringement in the patent document, it must cover all the technical features recorded in the claim. Therefore, in order to obtain a larger scope of protection, the less content in the claim, the better, that is, do not add unnecessary content
the innovation of blockchain is usually associated with multiple executors, which is a systematic scheme that needs the cooperation of all parties. For example, if the data publishing node, blockchain network, authorization node, etc. are combined in a claim, it will be found that when the patentee wants to sue an executor for infringement, the party does not cover all the contents of the claim (at least not other executors), which leads to that although the party uses the innovative idea of the patent, it does not infringe. Therefore, in a claim, it is better to write the scope of protection around an executor< According to the patent law, except as otherwise provided in this law, no entity or indivial may exploit its patent without the permission of the patentee, that is, it may not manufacture, use, promise to sell, sell or import its patented procts, or use its patented methods, or use, sell or import its patented procts for proction and business purposes Promise to sell, sell and import the procts directly obtained according to the patented method
here we should pay attention to "for the purpose of proction and operation", that is to say, not for the purpose of implementation, no infringement. Therefore, when writing the claims, we should also consider who the potential infringement objects are, and the content of the patent right should limit them as far as possible, instead of including unnecessary objects (such as the devices used by the end consumers).
10. It depends on the national laws and regulations, involving the amount of money. If it's more than one million, it's estimated that the sentence will be a lot. You can consult the online lawyer for details.
Hot content