Why do people believe in virtual currency
Publish: 2021-05-12 19:19:34
1.
Because now people are influenced by some comments on the Internet, such as bitcoin, its value has increased many times since it came into being, people think that virtual currency should be a very promising thing, so many people follow suit
if you really have a lot of spare money, you can consider investing in some stable bonds, some science and technology innovation board and stocks, but don't invest too much in virtual currency
2. Reason: with the rapid development of information technology, real money is far from meeting people's demand for capital flow. If there are enough people to recognize the value of a virtual currency, it may become a substitute unit of material exchange, and the existence of virtual currency will inevitably cause another upsurge in the financial sector
in view of the possible risks of virtual currency, many international organizations and central banks have responded publicly to the supervision of virtual currency system. These responses can be roughly divided into four categories: warning and risk warning, supervision and registration permission, legislative norms, and explicit prohibition
(1) warning and risk warning
some central banks and regulators have issued risk warnings against the special currency and virtual currency system. The federal financial regulatory authority of Germany, the Bank of France, the central banks of the Netherlands and Belgium have issued public warnings against the possible money laundering and terrorist financing caused by the use of bitcoin. In the report released at the end of 2013, the European Banking authority (EBA) warned consumers of many risks of virtual currency, such as exchange loss, e-wallet theft, unprotected payment, price fluctuation and so on. Although Spain did not have a similar risk warning, it issued a timely information announcement related to virtual currency
(2) supervision and registration license
generally speaking, international organizations believe that the supervision of virtual currency should find a balance between risk prevention and innovation promotion. Since 2012, Sweden has required transactions related to virtual currency to be registered with financial regulators. Other countries pay attention to qualification supervision, so as to make it indirectly meet the requirements of prudential supervision. In other countries, the regulation mainly focuses on the business model of virtual currency transaction. The financial prudential regulatory authority of France regards the provision of bitcoin circulation and trading services and the act of earning funds in the process as a payment service and requires the authorization of the government. In addition, some countries focus on the intermediary institutions related to virtual currency. The German federal financial regulatory agency and Danish regulators believe that the provision of intermediary services for virtual currency needs to be authorized< (3) legislative norms
at present, some countries have proposed legislation to regulate virtual currency transactions. Canada plans to legislate to allow the government to supervise the transaction of bitcoin, and to include the transaction of more than US $10000 into the scope of suspicious supervision. The United States hopes to adjust the relevant legal structure should be compared with the development of the special currency. In order to make the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) applicable in the context of network, the financial crime enforcement network (FinCEN) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued the explanatory guidance on the behavior and subject definition of private generation, holding, distribution, trading, acceptance and transmission of virtual currency in 2013. The European central bank stressed that it should strengthen international cooperation under the existing legal framework, and regulate virtual currency from the European and global level under the existing legal framework. More countries believe that bitcoin is not a currency in circulation, has no legal status, and does not meet the definition of financial instruments, such as Finland, Sweden, Malaysia and Indonesia
(4) it is forbidden
in some countries, bitcoin related transactions are prohibited. In December 2013, the people's Bank of China banned financial institutions from trading in bitcoin, which was subsequently extended to payment service providers. The central banks of Thailand and Indonesia share the same attitude. The circulation of anonymous internet currency (including bitcoin) is prohibited by the Russian judicial inspection department as a substitute for currency. The Central Bank of Russia has earlier included the provision of bitcoin services in the scope of suspicious transaction monitoring. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has banned the issue of unregistered shares in exchange for bitcoin, and unregistered online securities trading activities in virtual currency.
in view of the possible risks of virtual currency, many international organizations and central banks have responded publicly to the supervision of virtual currency system. These responses can be roughly divided into four categories: warning and risk warning, supervision and registration permission, legislative norms, and explicit prohibition
(1) warning and risk warning
some central banks and regulators have issued risk warnings against the special currency and virtual currency system. The federal financial regulatory authority of Germany, the Bank of France, the central banks of the Netherlands and Belgium have issued public warnings against the possible money laundering and terrorist financing caused by the use of bitcoin. In the report released at the end of 2013, the European Banking authority (EBA) warned consumers of many risks of virtual currency, such as exchange loss, e-wallet theft, unprotected payment, price fluctuation and so on. Although Spain did not have a similar risk warning, it issued a timely information announcement related to virtual currency
(2) supervision and registration license
generally speaking, international organizations believe that the supervision of virtual currency should find a balance between risk prevention and innovation promotion. Since 2012, Sweden has required transactions related to virtual currency to be registered with financial regulators. Other countries pay attention to qualification supervision, so as to make it indirectly meet the requirements of prudential supervision. In other countries, the regulation mainly focuses on the business model of virtual currency transaction. The financial prudential regulatory authority of France regards the provision of bitcoin circulation and trading services and the act of earning funds in the process as a payment service and requires the authorization of the government. In addition, some countries focus on the intermediary institutions related to virtual currency. The German federal financial regulatory agency and Danish regulators believe that the provision of intermediary services for virtual currency needs to be authorized< (3) legislative norms
at present, some countries have proposed legislation to regulate virtual currency transactions. Canada plans to legislate to allow the government to supervise the transaction of bitcoin, and to include the transaction of more than US $10000 into the scope of suspicious supervision. The United States hopes to adjust the relevant legal structure should be compared with the development of the special currency. In order to make the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) applicable in the context of network, the financial crime enforcement network (FinCEN) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued the explanatory guidance on the behavior and subject definition of private generation, holding, distribution, trading, acceptance and transmission of virtual currency in 2013. The European central bank stressed that it should strengthen international cooperation under the existing legal framework, and regulate virtual currency from the European and global level under the existing legal framework. More countries believe that bitcoin is not a currency in circulation, has no legal status, and does not meet the definition of financial instruments, such as Finland, Sweden, Malaysia and Indonesia
(4) it is forbidden
in some countries, bitcoin related transactions are prohibited. In December 2013, the people's Bank of China banned financial institutions from trading in bitcoin, which was subsequently extended to payment service providers. The central banks of Thailand and Indonesia share the same attitude. The circulation of anonymous internet currency (including bitcoin) is prohibited by the Russian judicial inspection department as a substitute for currency. The Central Bank of Russia has earlier included the provision of bitcoin services in the scope of suspicious transaction monitoring. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has banned the issue of unregistered shares in exchange for bitcoin, and unregistered online securities trading activities in virtual currency.
3. Because you focus on the news of making money, or people around you instill in you the concept that virtual currency can make people make money
it can clearly tell you that the attitude of domestic regulators is clear. Whether it is genuine bitcoin, or a variety of derivative Shanzhai virtual currency, there is no way to obtain legal living space at present. This is something we need to be clear about. If the platform goes out of business or the staff runs away, it is very likely that they will lose all their money and the losses they have suffered will not be protected by law
the promises they give you often make the participants pay money quickly. Behind them is the Ponzi scheme of "robbing the east to pay the west" + "cheating the white wolf with empty hands". They use the money of new investors to pay interest and short-term return to old investors, so as to create the illusion of making money and cheat more investment. When no new investors enter, the return of old investors collapses one after another, and it is often difficult to withdraw cash, or the website cannot be opened
in short, although the external form of virtual currency is ever-changing, it is not divorced from its essence of pyramid selling. The more investors put in, the greater the final loss, and the more serious the loss may be
all the above are personal opinions. I hope they can help you. Thank you
it can clearly tell you that the attitude of domestic regulators is clear. Whether it is genuine bitcoin, or a variety of derivative Shanzhai virtual currency, there is no way to obtain legal living space at present. This is something we need to be clear about. If the platform goes out of business or the staff runs away, it is very likely that they will lose all their money and the losses they have suffered will not be protected by law
the promises they give you often make the participants pay money quickly. Behind them is the Ponzi scheme of "robbing the east to pay the west" + "cheating the white wolf with empty hands". They use the money of new investors to pay interest and short-term return to old investors, so as to create the illusion of making money and cheat more investment. When no new investors enter, the return of old investors collapses one after another, and it is often difficult to withdraw cash, or the website cannot be opened
in short, although the external form of virtual currency is ever-changing, it is not divorced from its essence of pyramid selling. The more investors put in, the greater the final loss, and the more serious the loss may be
all the above are personal opinions. I hope they can help you. Thank you
4. Virtual currency is the necessity of social development, but the current virtual currency has great instability, because of the current instability, there will be so many people speculation, only instability will be accompanied by big risks and big profits, everyone has a gambler's heart.. Only to see who laughs to the end, the last dish man is probably these speculators..
5. There are no more than the following kinds of people touting virtual currency:
the first kind is the big guy who pretends to be confused. They boast about the greatness of virtual currency, in fact, just to sell their own coins, and then make their wealth more and more. This is the same reason that Mimeng's articles incite emotions. It's just to let people read more of her articles to sell advertisements. As for whether it is true or not, who cares
the second kind of people is the media outside the circle. In fact, they don't know anything. The purpose of their blowing together is to bring traffic. It's all for sale. It's just different. They follow together to brag, will have more traffic attention, advertising can be more valuable. If the business is not good, change the vest and continue. That's what we media and finance are doing now. True or false is not so important, the important thing is to bring them income, which is enough
the third kind of person is the leek of coin circle. In fact, they don't have the ability to think independently. They are superstitious in aura. They watch the big guys and the media blow, and then they really believe in it. They also blow,,,, and then they are the ones who take over. It is commonly known as "no brain blowing, no brain blowing". It lacks the ability of independent thinking, and does not carefully analyze things. It is respect to blow first and respect to blow first. Blind, therefore, only then dish's life.
the first kind is the big guy who pretends to be confused. They boast about the greatness of virtual currency, in fact, just to sell their own coins, and then make their wealth more and more. This is the same reason that Mimeng's articles incite emotions. It's just to let people read more of her articles to sell advertisements. As for whether it is true or not, who cares
the second kind of people is the media outside the circle. In fact, they don't know anything. The purpose of their blowing together is to bring traffic. It's all for sale. It's just different. They follow together to brag, will have more traffic attention, advertising can be more valuable. If the business is not good, change the vest and continue. That's what we media and finance are doing now. True or false is not so important, the important thing is to bring them income, which is enough
the third kind of person is the leek of coin circle. In fact, they don't have the ability to think independently. They are superstitious in aura. They watch the big guys and the media blow, and then they really believe in it. They also blow,,,, and then they are the ones who take over. It is commonly known as "no brain blowing, no brain blowing". It lacks the ability of independent thinking, and does not carefully analyze things. It is respect to blow first and respect to blow first. Blind, therefore, only then dish's life.
6. Before you answer this question, it depends on the population from which you know the "fact that you can make a steady profit in one or two years". If the person who is doing this tells you, you need to distinguish his true from false. Most of the reasons why he says this to you are to take you into the company. At least the people I met who made these things around me didn't make a steady profit and didn't make a loss. More importantly, they made a big loss and got a new name called "cyber refugee". Let's analyze the whole model of virtual currency. It's a pyramid model. A person brings in more people to earn money from the latecomers. In the early stage, he can get a return. Because there is no return, the people in the early stage will not be so willing to recruit the people in the later stage. When he develops to a certain scale, he can no longer put forward any money. Therefore, whether a platform or a currency can last for one or two years depends on whether the scale is large enough and whether there are enough latecomers. Otherwise, how can we afford to give back to the early entrants? So only platform operators can make a steady profit
7.
Bitcoin BTC 2009 Satoshi Nakamoto is bitcoin / org ~ $24.3 billion is SHA-256; LTC 2011 coblee is litecoin / org ~ $3.6 billion is script infinite; IFC 2012 ifccion is ifccoin / ORG~$ $20 million is a script quark, qrk 2012, qrkcion is cgbcion / org - $10 million is a script zeta, ZET 2012 zetcony is ZET / org - $10 million is a script proof of work / POS
8. Just for the small words below you, I just want to ask, is knowledge, technology and skills valuable! Is it real?
9.
To answer this question, we must first understand the role and characteristics of bitcoin
function: bitcoin is also a medium. In some transactions, bitcoin is used as legal currency. It is the same as gold can be used as a medium in the transaction of different countries on a global scale, or the euro used by the European Union and the Korean won used by South Korea. Bitcoin is mainly a medium (money) that can be directly traded through the Internet
features: compared with gold, it is easy to carry, and compared with legal currency, it is decentralized and untraceable
let me talk about a coinegg investor I know, and give the reasons why I believe in bitcoin:
-
society will inevitably be a pluralistic society in the future. Centralized legal money (person to bank to another person, two person transfers must be made through the bank. Transfer is centralization, that is, indivial bank to another person) will continue to exist, Decentralized (person to person, not through third-party intermediaries such as banks, i.e. person to person) bitcoin will also be needed and used by people
-
the number of bitcoins is fixed, with a total amount of 21 million. So far, more than 17 million bitcoins have been g up, and the total market value of circulation is about 870 billion, which is not as high as the market value of Maotai. However, the global decentralized market is far from that So far, the decentralized market only recognizes bitcoin)
< / OL >
Hot content