Ethereum anti-jamming calculation
Publish: 2021-05-28 23:06:27
1. bitcoin is a consensus network, contributing to a new payment system and a fully digital currency. It is the first decentralized peer-to-peer payment network, which is controlled by its users without a central management organization or middleman. From the user's point of view, bitcoin is much like Internet cash. Bitcoin can also be regarded as the most outstanding three style bookkeeping system
anyone can run software on specialized hardware and become a bitcoin miner. mining software monitors transaction broadcast through P2P network and performs appropriate tasks to process and confirm these transactions. Bitcoin miners can earn transaction fees paid by users to speed up transaction processing and additional bitcoin issued according to fixed formula
new transactions need to be included in a block with mathematical workload proof before they can be confirmed. This kind of proof is hard to generate because it can only be generated by trying billions of calculations per second. Miners need to run these calculations before their blocks are accepted and rewarded. As more people start mining, the difficulty of finding effective blocks will be automatically increased by the network to ensure that the average time to find a block remains at 10 minutes. Therefore, the competition for mining is very fierce, and no indivial miner can control the content contained in the block chain
workload proof is also designed to rely on previous blocks, which forces the time sequence of block chain. This design makes it extremely difficult to cancel previous transactions, because the workload proof of all subsequent blocks needs to be recalculated. When two blocks are found at the same time, the miner will process the first block received, and once the next block is found, it will be transferred to the longest block chain. This ensures that the mining process maintains a global consistency based on processing capacity
bitcoin miners can neither increase their rewards by cheating, nor deal with the fraulent transactions that destroy the bitcoin network, because all bitcoin nodes will reject the blocks containing invalid data that violate the bitcoin protocol rules. Therefore, even if not all bitcoin miners can be trusted, the bitcoin network is still secure
sha256 is an encryption algorithm.
anyone can run software on specialized hardware and become a bitcoin miner. mining software monitors transaction broadcast through P2P network and performs appropriate tasks to process and confirm these transactions. Bitcoin miners can earn transaction fees paid by users to speed up transaction processing and additional bitcoin issued according to fixed formula
new transactions need to be included in a block with mathematical workload proof before they can be confirmed. This kind of proof is hard to generate because it can only be generated by trying billions of calculations per second. Miners need to run these calculations before their blocks are accepted and rewarded. As more people start mining, the difficulty of finding effective blocks will be automatically increased by the network to ensure that the average time to find a block remains at 10 minutes. Therefore, the competition for mining is very fierce, and no indivial miner can control the content contained in the block chain
workload proof is also designed to rely on previous blocks, which forces the time sequence of block chain. This design makes it extremely difficult to cancel previous transactions, because the workload proof of all subsequent blocks needs to be recalculated. When two blocks are found at the same time, the miner will process the first block received, and once the next block is found, it will be transferred to the longest block chain. This ensures that the mining process maintains a global consistency based on processing capacity
bitcoin miners can neither increase their rewards by cheating, nor deal with the fraulent transactions that destroy the bitcoin network, because all bitcoin nodes will reject the blocks containing invalid data that violate the bitcoin protocol rules. Therefore, even if not all bitcoin miners can be trusted, the bitcoin network is still secure
sha256 is an encryption algorithm.
2. Sha family
Sha (secure hash algorithm) is a series of cryptographic hash functions designed by National Security Agency (NSA) and published by National Institute of standards and Technology (NIST). The first member of the family officially named Sha was published in 1993. However, it has now been given an informal name sha-0 to avoid confusion with its successors. Two years later, SHA-1, the successor of the first Sha, was released. There are also four variants that have been released to enhance the scope of output and to change some minor designs: sha-224, SHA-256, sha-384, and sha-512 (sometimes referred to as SHA-2)<
sha-0 and SHA-1
the algorithms originally specified were published in 1993, which are called secure hash standard, FIPS pub 180. This version is now often called & quot; SHA-0" It was withdrawn by NSA soon after its release, and released in 1995 as a revised version of FIPS pub 180-1 (commonly known as & quot; SHA-1") replace. According to NSA, it fixed an error in the original algorithm that would rece password security. However, NSA does not provide any further explanation or proof that the error has been corrected. In 1998, in an attack on sha-0, it was found that this attack was not applicable to SHA-1 - we don't know if this is the error found by NSA, but it may indicate that this correction has improved the security. SHA-1 has been closely examined by the public password community, but it has not been found to be unsafe. It is now considered safe
sha-0 and SHA-1 will generate a 160 bit digest from a message with a maximum size of 2 ^ 64 bits, and then encrypt it based on the similar principle of Ronald L. Rivest, Professor of MIT who designed MD4 and MD5 message digest algorithms<
Cryptanalysis of sha-0
on crypto 98, two French researchers demonstrated an attack on sha-0 (chabaud and joux, 1998): hash collision can be found when the complexity is 2 ^ 61; Less than 2 ^ 80 is an ideal hash function of the same size
in 2004, Biham and Chen discovered the approximate collision of sha-0 - two messages can hash out the same value; In this case, 142 and 160 bits are the same. They also found that sha-0 dropped to 62 bits after 80 full collisions
on August 12, 2004, joux, carribault, lemuet and jalby announced the hash collision of the complete sha-0 algorithm. This is the result of the attack of chabaud and joux. The collision was found to be 2 ^ 51, and it took about 80000 CPU hours to work on a supercomputer with 256 Itanium 2 processors< On August 17, 2004, Wang, Feng, Lai, and Yu announced the preliminary results of attacking MD5, sha-0, and other hash functions at the rump meeting of crypto 2004. Their attack on sha-0 is as complex as 2 ^ 40, which means that their attack results are better than those of joux and others. A brief summary of the rump meeting can be found here, and their discussions in sci.crypt, for example, suggest that people planning to use SHA-1 as a new cryptosystem need to reconsider
longer variants
NIST has released three additional Sha variants, each with a longer message digest. They are named by adding their summary length (in bits) after their original name: & quot; SHA-256", & quot; SHA-384" And & quot; SHA-512" They were published in the draft of FIPS pub 180-2 in 2001, and then passed the review and comments. FIPS pub 180-2, including SHA-1, was released as an official standard in 2002. These new hash functions have not been tested in detail by the public password community like SHA-1, so their password security is not widely trusted. In February 2004, a change notice of FIPS pub 180-2 was issued, and an additional variant was added; SHA-224"， The key length required for double key 3DES is defined
Gilbert and handschuh (2003) studied new varieties and found no weaknesses<
shad
shad function is a simple restatement of the same Sha function:
shad-256 (m) = SHA-256 (SHA-256 (m)). It overcomes the problem of extended length attacks
applications
SHA-1, sha-224, SHA-256, sha-384 and sha-512 are all used by the U.S. federal government, which needs secure hash algorithms. They also use other cryptographic algorithms and protocols to protect sensitive unclassified data. FIPS pub 180-1 also encourages private or commercial organizations to use SHA-1 encryption. Fritz chip will probably use SHA-1 hash function to realize digital rights management on personal computers
the first to promote the publication of secure hash algorithm is the combined digital signature standard
Sha hash function has been used as the basis of shacal block cipher algorithm<
description of SHA-1
the pseudocode of SHA-1 algorithm is as follows:
(initialize variables:)
A = H0 = 0x67452301
b = H1 = 0xefcdab89
C = h2 = 0x98badcfe
d = H3 = 0x10325476
e = H4 = 0xc3d2e1f0
(pre processing:)
paddedmessage = (message) append 1
while length (paddedmessage) mod 512 & gt; 448:
paddedmessage = paddedmessage append 0
paddedmessage = paddedmessage append (length(message) in 64-bit format)
(Process the message in successive 512-bit chunks:)
while 512-bit chunk(s) remain(s):
break the current chunk into sixteen 32-bit words w(i), 0 <= i <= 15
(Extend the sixteen 32-bit words into eighty 32-bit words:)
for i from 16 to 79:
w(i) = (w(i-3) xor w(i-8) xor w(i-14) xor w(i-16)) leftrotate 1
(Main loop:)
for i from 0 to 79:
temp = (a leftrotate 5) + f(b,c,d) + e + k + w(i) (note: all addition is mod 2^32)
where:
(0 <= i <= 19): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or ((not b) and d), k = 0x5A827999
(20 <= i <= 39): f(b,c,d) = (b xor c xor d), k = 0x6ED9EBA1
(40 <= i <= 59): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or (b and d) or (c and d), k = 0x8F1BBCDC
(60 <= i <= 79): F (B, C, d) = (b XOR C XOR d), k = 0xca62c1d6
e = d
d = C
C = B leftrotate 30
b = a
A = temp
H0 = H0 + a
H1 = H1 + B
h2 = H2 + C
H3 = H3 + d
H4 = H4 + e
digest = hash = H0 append H1 append H2 append H3 append H4
note: FIPS pub 180-1 shows the concept of, The efficiency can be improved by using the following formula:
(0 & lt= i <= 19): f(b,c,d) = (d xor (b and (c xor d)))
(40 <= i <= 59): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or (d and (b or c)))
Sha (secure hash algorithm) is a series of cryptographic hash functions designed by National Security Agency (NSA) and published by National Institute of standards and Technology (NIST). The first member of the family officially named Sha was published in 1993. However, it has now been given an informal name sha-0 to avoid confusion with its successors. Two years later, SHA-1, the successor of the first Sha, was released. There are also four variants that have been released to enhance the scope of output and to change some minor designs: sha-224, SHA-256, sha-384, and sha-512 (sometimes referred to as SHA-2)<
sha-0 and SHA-1
the algorithms originally specified were published in 1993, which are called secure hash standard, FIPS pub 180. This version is now often called & quot; SHA-0" It was withdrawn by NSA soon after its release, and released in 1995 as a revised version of FIPS pub 180-1 (commonly known as & quot; SHA-1") replace. According to NSA, it fixed an error in the original algorithm that would rece password security. However, NSA does not provide any further explanation or proof that the error has been corrected. In 1998, in an attack on sha-0, it was found that this attack was not applicable to SHA-1 - we don't know if this is the error found by NSA, but it may indicate that this correction has improved the security. SHA-1 has been closely examined by the public password community, but it has not been found to be unsafe. It is now considered safe
sha-0 and SHA-1 will generate a 160 bit digest from a message with a maximum size of 2 ^ 64 bits, and then encrypt it based on the similar principle of Ronald L. Rivest, Professor of MIT who designed MD4 and MD5 message digest algorithms<
Cryptanalysis of sha-0
on crypto 98, two French researchers demonstrated an attack on sha-0 (chabaud and joux, 1998): hash collision can be found when the complexity is 2 ^ 61; Less than 2 ^ 80 is an ideal hash function of the same size
in 2004, Biham and Chen discovered the approximate collision of sha-0 - two messages can hash out the same value; In this case, 142 and 160 bits are the same. They also found that sha-0 dropped to 62 bits after 80 full collisions
on August 12, 2004, joux, carribault, lemuet and jalby announced the hash collision of the complete sha-0 algorithm. This is the result of the attack of chabaud and joux. The collision was found to be 2 ^ 51, and it took about 80000 CPU hours to work on a supercomputer with 256 Itanium 2 processors< On August 17, 2004, Wang, Feng, Lai, and Yu announced the preliminary results of attacking MD5, sha-0, and other hash functions at the rump meeting of crypto 2004. Their attack on sha-0 is as complex as 2 ^ 40, which means that their attack results are better than those of joux and others. A brief summary of the rump meeting can be found here, and their discussions in sci.crypt, for example, suggest that people planning to use SHA-1 as a new cryptosystem need to reconsider
longer variants
NIST has released three additional Sha variants, each with a longer message digest. They are named by adding their summary length (in bits) after their original name: & quot; SHA-256", & quot; SHA-384" And & quot; SHA-512" They were published in the draft of FIPS pub 180-2 in 2001, and then passed the review and comments. FIPS pub 180-2, including SHA-1, was released as an official standard in 2002. These new hash functions have not been tested in detail by the public password community like SHA-1, so their password security is not widely trusted. In February 2004, a change notice of FIPS pub 180-2 was issued, and an additional variant was added; SHA-224"， The key length required for double key 3DES is defined
Gilbert and handschuh (2003) studied new varieties and found no weaknesses<
shad
shad function is a simple restatement of the same Sha function:
shad-256 (m) = SHA-256 (SHA-256 (m)). It overcomes the problem of extended length attacks
applications
SHA-1, sha-224, SHA-256, sha-384 and sha-512 are all used by the U.S. federal government, which needs secure hash algorithms. They also use other cryptographic algorithms and protocols to protect sensitive unclassified data. FIPS pub 180-1 also encourages private or commercial organizations to use SHA-1 encryption. Fritz chip will probably use SHA-1 hash function to realize digital rights management on personal computers
the first to promote the publication of secure hash algorithm is the combined digital signature standard
Sha hash function has been used as the basis of shacal block cipher algorithm<
description of SHA-1
the pseudocode of SHA-1 algorithm is as follows:
(initialize variables:)
A = H0 = 0x67452301
b = H1 = 0xefcdab89
C = h2 = 0x98badcfe
d = H3 = 0x10325476
e = H4 = 0xc3d2e1f0
(pre processing:)
paddedmessage = (message) append 1
while length (paddedmessage) mod 512 & gt; 448:
paddedmessage = paddedmessage append 0
paddedmessage = paddedmessage append (length(message) in 64-bit format)
(Process the message in successive 512-bit chunks:)
while 512-bit chunk(s) remain(s):
break the current chunk into sixteen 32-bit words w(i), 0 <= i <= 15
(Extend the sixteen 32-bit words into eighty 32-bit words:)
for i from 16 to 79:
w(i) = (w(i-3) xor w(i-8) xor w(i-14) xor w(i-16)) leftrotate 1
(Main loop:)
for i from 0 to 79:
temp = (a leftrotate 5) + f(b,c,d) + e + k + w(i) (note: all addition is mod 2^32)
where:
(0 <= i <= 19): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or ((not b) and d), k = 0x5A827999
(20 <= i <= 39): f(b,c,d) = (b xor c xor d), k = 0x6ED9EBA1
(40 <= i <= 59): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or (b and d) or (c and d), k = 0x8F1BBCDC
(60 <= i <= 79): F (B, C, d) = (b XOR C XOR d), k = 0xca62c1d6
e = d
d = C
C = B leftrotate 30
b = a
A = temp
H0 = H0 + a
H1 = H1 + B
h2 = H2 + C
H3 = H3 + d
H4 = H4 + e
digest = hash = H0 append H1 append H2 append H3 append H4
note: FIPS pub 180-1 shows the concept of, The efficiency can be improved by using the following formula:
(0 & lt= i <= 19): f(b,c,d) = (d xor (b and (c xor d)))
(40 <= i <= 59): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or (d and (b or c)))
3.
4. Sha family
Sha (secure hash algorithm) is a series of cryptographic hash functions designed by National Security Agency (NSA) and published by National Institute of standards and Technology (NIST). The first member of the family officially named Sha was published in 1993. However, it has now been given an informal name sha-0 to avoid confusion with its successors. Two years later, SHA-1, the successor of the first Sha, was released. There are also four variants that have been released to enhance the scope of output and to change some minor designs: sha-224, SHA-256, sha-384, and sha-512 (sometimes referred to as SHA-2)<
sha-0 and SHA-1
the algorithms originally specified were published in 1993, which are called secure hash standard, FIPS pub 180. This version is now often called & quot; SHA-0" It was withdrawn by NSA soon after its release, and released in 1995 as a revised version of FIPS pub 180-1 (commonly known as & quot; SHA-1") replace. According to NSA, it fixed an error in the original algorithm that would rece password security. However, NSA does not provide any further explanation or proof that the error has been corrected. In 1998, in an attack on sha-0, it was found that this attack was not applicable to SHA-1 - we don't know if this is the error found by NSA, but it may indicate that this correction has improved the security. SHA-1 has been closely examined by the public password community, but it has not been found to be unsafe. It is now considered safe
sha-0 and SHA-1 will generate a 160 bit digest from a message with a maximum size of 2 ^ 64 bits, and then encrypt it based on the similar principle of Ronald L. Rivest, Professor of MIT who designed MD4 and MD5 message digest algorithms<
Cryptanalysis of sha-0
on crypto 98, two French researchers demonstrated an attack on sha-0 (chabaud and joux, 1998): hash collision can be found when the complexity is 2 ^ 61; Less than 2 ^ 80 is an ideal hash function of the same size
in 2004, Biham and Chen discovered the approximate collision of sha-0 - two messages can hash out the same value; In this case, 142 and 160 bits are the same. They also found that sha-0 dropped to 62 bits after 80 full collisions
on August 12, 2004, joux, carribault, lemuet and jalby announced the hash collision of the complete sha-0 algorithm. This is the result of the attack of chabaud and joux. The collision was found to be 2 ^ 51, and it took about 80000 CPU hours to work on a supercomputer with 256 Itanium 2 processors< On August 17, 2004, Wang, Feng, Lai, and Yu announced the preliminary results of attacking MD5, sha-0, and other hash functions at the rump meeting of crypto 2004. Their attack on sha-0 is as complex as 2 ^ 40, which means that their attack results are better than those of joux and others. A brief summary of the rump meeting can be found here, and their discussions in sci.crypt, for example, suggest that people planning to use SHA-1 as a new cryptosystem need to reconsider
longer variants
NIST has released three additional Sha variants, each with a longer message digest. They are named by adding their summary length (in bits) after their original name: & quot; SHA-256", & quot; SHA-384" And & quot; SHA-512" They were published in the draft of FIPS pub 180-2 in 2001, and then passed the review and comments. FIPS pub 180-2, including SHA-1, was released as an official standard in 2002. These new hash functions have not been tested in detail by the public password community like SHA-1, so their password security is not widely trusted. In February 2004, a change notice of FIPS pub 180-2 was issued, and an additional variant was added; SHA-224"， The key length required for double key 3DES is defined
Gilbert and handschuh (2003) studied new varieties and found no weaknesses<
shad
shad function is a simple restatement of the same Sha function:
shad-256 (m) = SHA-256 (SHA-256 (m)). It overcomes the problem of extended length attacks
applications
SHA-1, sha-224, SHA-256, sha-384 and sha-512 are all used by the U.S. federal government, which needs secure hash algorithms. They also use other cryptographic algorithms and protocols to protect sensitive unclassified data. FIPS pub 180-1 also encourages private or commercial organizations to use SHA-1 encryption. Fritz chip will probably use SHA-1 hash function to realize digital rights management on personal computers
the first to promote the publication of secure hash algorithm is the combined digital signature standard
Sha hash function has been used as the basis of shacal block cipher algorithm<
description of SHA-1
the following is the pseudo code of SHA-1 algorithm:
(initialize variables:)
A = H0 = 0x67452301
b = H1 = 0xefcdab89
C = h2 = 0x98badcfe
d = H3 = 0x10325476
e = H4 = 0xc3d2e1f0
(pre processing:)
paddedmessage = (message) append 1
while length (paddedmessage) mod 512 & lt; > 448:
paddedmessage = paddedmessage append 0
paddedmessage = paddedmessage append (length(message) in 64-bit format)
(Process the message in successive 512-bit chunks:)
while 512-bit chunk(s) remain(s):
break the current chunk into sixteen 32-bit words w(i), 0 <= i <= 15
(Extend the sixteen 32-bit words into eighty 32-bit words:)
for i from 16 to 79:
w(i) = (w(i-3) xor w(i-8) xor w(i-14) xor w(i-16)) leftrotate 1
(Main loop:)
for i from 0 to 79:
temp = (a leftrotate 5) + f(b,c,d) + e + k + w(i) (note: all addition is mod 2^32)
where:
(0 <= i <= 19): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or ((not b) and d), k = 0x5A827999
(20 <= i <= 39): f(b,c,d) = (b xor c xor d), k = 0x6ED9EBA1
(40 <= i <= 59): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or (b and d) or (c and d), k = 0x8F1BBCDC
(60 <= i <= 79): F (B, C, d) = (b XOR C XOR d), k = 0xca62c1d6
e = d
d = C
C = B leftrotate 30
b = a
A = temp
H0 = H0 + a
H1 = H1 + B
h2 = H2 + C
H3 = H3 + d
H4 = H4 + e
digest = hash = H0 append H1 append H2 append H3 append H4
note: FIPS pub 180-1 shows the concept of, The efficiency can be improved by using the following formula:
(0 & lt= i <= 19): f(b,c,d) = (d xor (b and (c xor d)))
(40 <= i <= 59): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or (d and (b or c)))
Sha (secure hash algorithm) is a series of cryptographic hash functions designed by National Security Agency (NSA) and published by National Institute of standards and Technology (NIST). The first member of the family officially named Sha was published in 1993. However, it has now been given an informal name sha-0 to avoid confusion with its successors. Two years later, SHA-1, the successor of the first Sha, was released. There are also four variants that have been released to enhance the scope of output and to change some minor designs: sha-224, SHA-256, sha-384, and sha-512 (sometimes referred to as SHA-2)<
sha-0 and SHA-1
the algorithms originally specified were published in 1993, which are called secure hash standard, FIPS pub 180. This version is now often called & quot; SHA-0" It was withdrawn by NSA soon after its release, and released in 1995 as a revised version of FIPS pub 180-1 (commonly known as & quot; SHA-1") replace. According to NSA, it fixed an error in the original algorithm that would rece password security. However, NSA does not provide any further explanation or proof that the error has been corrected. In 1998, in an attack on sha-0, it was found that this attack was not applicable to SHA-1 - we don't know if this is the error found by NSA, but it may indicate that this correction has improved the security. SHA-1 has been closely examined by the public password community, but it has not been found to be unsafe. It is now considered safe
sha-0 and SHA-1 will generate a 160 bit digest from a message with a maximum size of 2 ^ 64 bits, and then encrypt it based on the similar principle of Ronald L. Rivest, Professor of MIT who designed MD4 and MD5 message digest algorithms<
Cryptanalysis of sha-0
on crypto 98, two French researchers demonstrated an attack on sha-0 (chabaud and joux, 1998): hash collision can be found when the complexity is 2 ^ 61; Less than 2 ^ 80 is an ideal hash function of the same size
in 2004, Biham and Chen discovered the approximate collision of sha-0 - two messages can hash out the same value; In this case, 142 and 160 bits are the same. They also found that sha-0 dropped to 62 bits after 80 full collisions
on August 12, 2004, joux, carribault, lemuet and jalby announced the hash collision of the complete sha-0 algorithm. This is the result of the attack of chabaud and joux. The collision was found to be 2 ^ 51, and it took about 80000 CPU hours to work on a supercomputer with 256 Itanium 2 processors< On August 17, 2004, Wang, Feng, Lai, and Yu announced the preliminary results of attacking MD5, sha-0, and other hash functions at the rump meeting of crypto 2004. Their attack on sha-0 is as complex as 2 ^ 40, which means that their attack results are better than those of joux and others. A brief summary of the rump meeting can be found here, and their discussions in sci.crypt, for example, suggest that people planning to use SHA-1 as a new cryptosystem need to reconsider
longer variants
NIST has released three additional Sha variants, each with a longer message digest. They are named by adding their summary length (in bits) after their original name: & quot; SHA-256", & quot; SHA-384" And & quot; SHA-512" They were published in the draft of FIPS pub 180-2 in 2001, and then passed the review and comments. FIPS pub 180-2, including SHA-1, was released as an official standard in 2002. These new hash functions have not been tested in detail by the public password community like SHA-1, so their password security is not widely trusted. In February 2004, a change notice of FIPS pub 180-2 was issued, and an additional variant was added; SHA-224"， The key length required for double key 3DES is defined
Gilbert and handschuh (2003) studied new varieties and found no weaknesses<
shad
shad function is a simple restatement of the same Sha function:
shad-256 (m) = SHA-256 (SHA-256 (m)). It overcomes the problem of extended length attacks
applications
SHA-1, sha-224, SHA-256, sha-384 and sha-512 are all used by the U.S. federal government, which needs secure hash algorithms. They also use other cryptographic algorithms and protocols to protect sensitive unclassified data. FIPS pub 180-1 also encourages private or commercial organizations to use SHA-1 encryption. Fritz chip will probably use SHA-1 hash function to realize digital rights management on personal computers
the first to promote the publication of secure hash algorithm is the combined digital signature standard
Sha hash function has been used as the basis of shacal block cipher algorithm<
description of SHA-1
the following is the pseudo code of SHA-1 algorithm:
(initialize variables:)
A = H0 = 0x67452301
b = H1 = 0xefcdab89
C = h2 = 0x98badcfe
d = H3 = 0x10325476
e = H4 = 0xc3d2e1f0
(pre processing:)
paddedmessage = (message) append 1
while length (paddedmessage) mod 512 & lt; > 448:
paddedmessage = paddedmessage append 0
paddedmessage = paddedmessage append (length(message) in 64-bit format)
(Process the message in successive 512-bit chunks:)
while 512-bit chunk(s) remain(s):
break the current chunk into sixteen 32-bit words w(i), 0 <= i <= 15
(Extend the sixteen 32-bit words into eighty 32-bit words:)
for i from 16 to 79:
w(i) = (w(i-3) xor w(i-8) xor w(i-14) xor w(i-16)) leftrotate 1
(Main loop:)
for i from 0 to 79:
temp = (a leftrotate 5) + f(b,c,d) + e + k + w(i) (note: all addition is mod 2^32)
where:
(0 <= i <= 19): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or ((not b) and d), k = 0x5A827999
(20 <= i <= 39): f(b,c,d) = (b xor c xor d), k = 0x6ED9EBA1
(40 <= i <= 59): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or (b and d) or (c and d), k = 0x8F1BBCDC
(60 <= i <= 79): F (B, C, d) = (b XOR C XOR d), k = 0xca62c1d6
e = d
d = C
C = B leftrotate 30
b = a
A = temp
H0 = H0 + a
H1 = H1 + B
h2 = H2 + C
H3 = H3 + d
H4 = H4 + e
digest = hash = H0 append H1 append H2 append H3 append H4
note: FIPS pub 180-1 shows the concept of, The efficiency can be improved by using the following formula:
(0 & lt= i <= 19): f(b,c,d) = (d xor (b and (c xor d)))
(40 <= i <= 59): f(b,c,d) = (b and c) or (d and (b or c)))
5.
Sha is a hash algorithm, not an encryption algorithm. There is no decryption problem
reason:
to decrypt data is to find any source data and generate the same target data
sha256 is basically unbreakable, that is, the "collision" result can not be found (or the probability is very small)
website decryption rules:
the website selects a group of encryption algorithm and hash algorithm from the information sent by the browser, and sends its own identity information back to the browser in the form of certificate. The certificate contains the website address, encrypted public key, and the certificate authority and other information
extended data:
in the process of encryption and decryption, the browser verifies the website:
1. Verify the legitimacy of the certificate (whether the certification authority is legal, whether the website address contained in the certificate is consistent with the address being visited, etc.). If the certificate is trusted, a small lock will be displayed in the browser bar, Otherwise, the certificate will not be trusted
2. If the certificate is trusted or the user accepts the untrusted certificate, the browser will generate a string of random number passwords and encrypt them with the public key provided in the certificate
3. Use the agreed hash algorithm to calculate the handshake message, and use the generated random number to encrypt the message, and finally send all the previously generated information to the website< br />
6. Sha family
Sha (secure hash algorithm) is a series of cryptographic hash functions designed by National Security Agency (NSA) and published by National Institute of standards and Technology (NIST). The first member of the family officially named Sha was published in 1993. However, it has now been given an informal name sha-0 to avoid confusion with its successors. Two years later, SHA-1, the successor of the first Sha, was released. There are also four variants that have been released to enhance the scope of output and to change some minor designs: sha-224, SHA-256, sha-384, and sha-512 (sometimes referred to as SHA-2)<
sha-0 and SHA-1
the algorithm originally specified was released in 1993, which is called secure hash standard, FIPS pub 180. This version is now often called & quot; SHA-0" It was withdrawn by NSA soon after its release, and released in 1995 as a revised version of FIPS pub 180-1 (commonly known as & quot; SHA-1") replace. According to NSA, it fixed an error in the original algorithm that would rece password security. However, NSA does not provide any further explanation or proof that the error has been corrected. In 1998, in an attack on sha-0, it was found that this attack was not applicable to SHA-1 - we don't know if this is the error found by NSA, but it may indicate that this correction has improved the security. SHA-1 has been closely examined by the public password community, but it has not been found to be unsafe. It is now considered safe
sha-0 and SHA-1 will generate a 160 bit digest from a message with a maximum size of 2 ^ 64 bits, and then encrypt it based on the similar principle of Ronald L. Rivest, Professor of MIT who designed MD4 and MD5 message digest algorithms<
Cryptanalysis of sha-0
on crypto 98, two French researchers demonstrated an attack on sha-0 (chabaud and joux, 1998): hash collision can be found when the complexity is 2 ^ 61; Less than 2 ^ 80 is an ideal hash function of the same size
in 2004, Biham and Chen discovered the approximate collision of sha-0 - two messages can hash out the same value; In this case, 142 and 160 bits are the same. They also found that sha-0 dropped to 62 bits after 80 full collisions
on August 12, 2004, joux, carribault, lemuet and jalby announced the hash collision of the complete sha-0 algorithm. This is the result of the attack of chabaud and joux. The collision was found to be 2 ^ 51, and it took about 80000 CPU hours to work on a supercomputer with 256 Itanium 2 processors< On August 17, 2004, Wang, Feng, Lai, and Yu announced the preliminary results of attacking MD5, sha-0, and other hash functions at the rump meeting of crypto 2004. Their attack on sha-0 is as complex as 2 ^ 40, which means that their attack results are better than those of joux and others. A brief summary of the rump meeting can be found here, and their discussions in sci.crypt, for example, suggest that people planning to use SHA-1 as a new cryptosystem need to reconsider
longer variants
NIST has released three additional Sha variants, each with a longer message digest. They are named by adding their summary length (in bits) after their original name: & quot; SHA-256", & quot; SHA-384" And & quot; SHA-512" They were published in the draft of FIPS pub 180-2 in 2001, and then passed the review and comments. FIPS pub 180-2, including SHA-1, was released as an official standard in 2002. These new hash functions have not been tested in detail by the public password community like SHA-1, so their password security is not widely trusted. In February 2004, a change notice of FIPS pub 180-2 was issued, and an additional variant was added; SHA-224"， The key length required for double key 3DES is defined
Gilbert and handschuh (2003) studied new varieties and found no weaknesses<
shad
shad function is a simple restatement of the same Sha function:
shad-256 (m)=
Sha (secure hash algorithm) is a series of cryptographic hash functions designed by National Security Agency (NSA) and published by National Institute of standards and Technology (NIST). The first member of the family officially named Sha was published in 1993. However, it has now been given an informal name sha-0 to avoid confusion with its successors. Two years later, SHA-1, the successor of the first Sha, was released. There are also four variants that have been released to enhance the scope of output and to change some minor designs: sha-224, SHA-256, sha-384, and sha-512 (sometimes referred to as SHA-2)<
sha-0 and SHA-1
the algorithm originally specified was released in 1993, which is called secure hash standard, FIPS pub 180. This version is now often called & quot; SHA-0" It was withdrawn by NSA soon after its release, and released in 1995 as a revised version of FIPS pub 180-1 (commonly known as & quot; SHA-1") replace. According to NSA, it fixed an error in the original algorithm that would rece password security. However, NSA does not provide any further explanation or proof that the error has been corrected. In 1998, in an attack on sha-0, it was found that this attack was not applicable to SHA-1 - we don't know if this is the error found by NSA, but it may indicate that this correction has improved the security. SHA-1 has been closely examined by the public password community, but it has not been found to be unsafe. It is now considered safe
sha-0 and SHA-1 will generate a 160 bit digest from a message with a maximum size of 2 ^ 64 bits, and then encrypt it based on the similar principle of Ronald L. Rivest, Professor of MIT who designed MD4 and MD5 message digest algorithms<
Cryptanalysis of sha-0
on crypto 98, two French researchers demonstrated an attack on sha-0 (chabaud and joux, 1998): hash collision can be found when the complexity is 2 ^ 61; Less than 2 ^ 80 is an ideal hash function of the same size
in 2004, Biham and Chen discovered the approximate collision of sha-0 - two messages can hash out the same value; In this case, 142 and 160 bits are the same. They also found that sha-0 dropped to 62 bits after 80 full collisions
on August 12, 2004, joux, carribault, lemuet and jalby announced the hash collision of the complete sha-0 algorithm. This is the result of the attack of chabaud and joux. The collision was found to be 2 ^ 51, and it took about 80000 CPU hours to work on a supercomputer with 256 Itanium 2 processors< On August 17, 2004, Wang, Feng, Lai, and Yu announced the preliminary results of attacking MD5, sha-0, and other hash functions at the rump meeting of crypto 2004. Their attack on sha-0 is as complex as 2 ^ 40, which means that their attack results are better than those of joux and others. A brief summary of the rump meeting can be found here, and their discussions in sci.crypt, for example, suggest that people planning to use SHA-1 as a new cryptosystem need to reconsider
longer variants
NIST has released three additional Sha variants, each with a longer message digest. They are named by adding their summary length (in bits) after their original name: & quot; SHA-256", & quot; SHA-384" And & quot; SHA-512" They were published in the draft of FIPS pub 180-2 in 2001, and then passed the review and comments. FIPS pub 180-2, including SHA-1, was released as an official standard in 2002. These new hash functions have not been tested in detail by the public password community like SHA-1, so their password security is not widely trusted. In February 2004, a change notice of FIPS pub 180-2 was issued, and an additional variant was added; SHA-224"， The key length required for double key 3DES is defined
Gilbert and handschuh (2003) studied new varieties and found no weaknesses<
shad
shad function is a simple restatement of the same Sha function:
shad-256 (m)=
7. The graphics card is broken.
8. There may be something wrong with the graphics memory of your graphics card. Generally, there are two possibilities for a black screen on the graphics card driver. One is that the graphics memory of your graphics card is damaged, and the other is that the graphics card driver is not suitable. If you have tried to install a graphics card driver and it is normal, it is basically the hardware problem of your graphics card. If you have a warranty, you'd better send it for warranty,
9. The performance of rx5802048sp is 10% higher than that of rx470. The power of rx5802048sp is 150W and rx470 is 120W. In recent years, amd family did not come up with new things, all rely on technology to improve performance.
10. Do you need to look at the parameters of the graphics card when you brush rx580? It's hard to tell from the appearance, because some 570 and 580 have similar appearance. You'd better download CPU Z software to see the parameters of the graphics card, or you can download adid64 software to see,
Hot content