How much computing power of rx370x graphics card

In terms of performance, gtx950 is only slightly worse than r9370x, and gtx1050 has surpassed r9370x

in terms of power consumption and process, gtx1050 with 10 architecture is even better than R9 370x

in general, gtx1050 is recommended in terms of performance and efficacy< br />

1. Most programs regard money as an asset rather than a means of circulation. Therefore, they rely on the asset price of money interest rate (or user cost) to calculate the elasticity of substitution (or quantity adjustment weight)< The Fisher ideal index is only an exception. Spindt uses the transaction speed of money as the weight, but the net turnover he extracts loses the economic information contained in the real transaction speed of money< However, most empirical analysis shows that compared with the traditional money quantity, the devisa index has no absolute advantage. The failure of devisa index in narrow currency indicates that there are some problems in its theoretical basis
4. The artificial neural network scheme is fuzzy in theory. The empirical sensitivity coefficient is affected by those factors, which is lack of theoretical explanation; As the input quantity, all kinds of money components are the quantity of money, excluding the factor of money speed; In addition, if the sensitivity coefficient corresponds to a specific output (such as inflation rate), then relatively different macro variables will have different sensitivity coefficient and different amount of money. This goes against the original intention of monetary index reform< In the dynamic factor analysis program, transaction and savings are regarded as the two determinants of each currency component. This is equivalent to assuming that the amount of money has included the information of transaction and savings. This is obviously wrong. The transaction function of money is mainly reflected by its speed, and the amount of money lacks the economic information included in the speed of money
6. So far, there is no reform plan that theoretically emphasizes the importance of real monetary speed to money, and no new monetary index has absolute advantages over the traditional index, No reform plan has been generally accepted by academic circles and monetary authorities. The traditional simple aggregate monetary aggregate is still the monetary indicator that monetary authorities and most economic studies rely on. The reform of monetary aggregate indicator in western countries has been in trouble after half a century
China's financial market development and interest rate marketization are still in the initial stage. Interest rate policy will be immature for a long time. In monetary policy, the amount of money is actually the main control target. China's financial system has developed rapidly in terms of computer and network systems, and has the advantage of backwardness, Even if China's financial system is highly developed in the future, momentum money will still be the most important monetary policy indicator. China can lead the world in the research and practice of dynamic money, The dilemma of western monetary index reform has exposed the limitations of western mainstream economics. The speed of monetary transaction is of key significance not only to the reform of monetary index, but also to the reform of economics, It is the eve of great changes. Chinese scholars have the responsibility to put forward unique views on the development strategy of economics in the 21st century