Blockchain creation post

1、 We usually publish articles and see that some pictures can't be displayed normally

Beijing Chuangshi node blockchain Technology Co., Ltd. is a limited liability company (invested or controlled by a natural person) registered in Miyun District of Beijing on August 1, 2018, with its registered address at 01-527, floor 5, Lanhua, No. 69, Xinnan Road, Miyun District, Beijing

the unified social credit code / registration number of Beijing Chuangshi node blockchain Technology Co., Ltd. is 91110228ma01dtdp5j, and the enterprise legal person is Yang Baoqi

the business scope of Beijing Chuangshi node blockchain Technology Co., Ltd. is: technology development, technology transfer and technology service; Data processing (except for bank card center and cloud computing data center with pue value above 1.5); Software development; Design, proce, act as an agent and publish advertisements; Economic and trade consultation; Sales of electronic procts, daily necessities, clothing, handicrafts; To undertake exhibition activities; Enterprise planning Enterprises independently choose business projects and carry out business activities according to law; For projects that need to be approved according to law, business activities shall be carried out according to the approved contents after being approved by relevant departments; It is not allowed to engage in business activities of projects prohibited or restricted by the instrial policies of this Municipality

view more information of Beijing Chuangshi node blockchain Technology Co., Ltd. through aiqicha

Right wing think tanks, such as the heritage foundation, took the lead in advocating the threat from the south, and they painted a unique picture of conspiracy. According to the heritage foundation, in the 1970s, the countries of the South used a set of strategies to systematically destroy the countries of the North:
at the summit meeting of non aligned countries held in Algiers in 1973, the group of 77 urged political alliance to strive for economic power. The participating countries ask the western countries to make a lot of economic concessions. The following year, they moved the struggle to the United Nations General Assembly and adopted the Declaration on the establishment of a new international economic order and the Charter of economic rights and ties of states, These resolutions are the theoretical guidelines for the southern countries to launch attacks on western countries in the next decade in order to seek a new international economic order (NIEO).
the heritage foundation continues to criticize that developing countries have spent a lot of time and resources to spread the idea; New international economic order; Ideology spreads not only in the whole UN system, but also outside the UN system. No United Nations Office or agency can escape
one of the key elements of the requirements of the new international economic order is the redistribution of funds: International taxes, increased foreign aid, the right to confiscate foreign private property, protection of commodity prices, and general commercial preferences related to transportation and trade. Another important principle of the new international economic order is to reallocate technology through the compulsory transfer of instry, submarine development, space and medical technology
the heritage foundation is particularly threatened by the efforts of the third world in the reallocation of natural resources: they hope to realize their understanding of the sea floor, the ocean floor and the sea floor through the Treaty on the law of the sea, the agreement on the development activities of states on the moon and other celestial bodies (also known as the moon Treaty) and an ongoing study and debate on Antarctica by the United Nations Space and control of Antarctica. Mahathir bin Muhammad, Prime Minister of Malaysia, is the main initiator of the movement for the United Nations to occupy Antarctica. He told the United Nations General Assembly that all unclaimed property on this planet is the common wealth of all mankind and therefore should be under the political control of the third world countries
countries in the South also tried to control the world resources they could not recognize: the information and data of private business were attacked by some countries in the world and the third world; The proposal for strict control of international pharmaceutical trade has been put on the agenda of several UN agencies, and other international agencies are formulating binding norms for the behavior of multinational companies; UNESCO proposes international restrictions on the media. The demons in the article are the governments of the third world countries. In the eyes of reaganists, no matter what their formal political inclinations are, most third world governments - except Chile and colonial Hong Kong - are all state interventionists and economic losers. Their involvement in the management of the economy led to a mess. ⑦ Such economic interventions include: imposing restrictions on the natural operation of free markets, such as protective measures for domestic enterprises, thus depriving consumers of the right to enjoy high-quality foreign procts, maintaining overvalued exchange rates to prevent exports, controlling foreign investment, thus encouraging inefficient proction, and price policies that hinder food proction
the purpose of resource redistribution in southern countries is to compensate for their failure in wealth creation. Therefore, the attempt to meet their demands by increasing foreign aid will only aggravate their economic recession, but will not slow down this trend: Although funding has little or no effect on accelerating development, it can alleviate the urgent shortage, especially the shortage of consumer goods and imported goods. This makes it easier for the government to temporarily cover up the worst effects of its destructive policies< In an influential article, conservative analysts Peter Bauer and basil Yamei argue more generally that external aid improves the funds, popularity and power of recipient governments, thus enhancing their control over other aspects of society. When social life and economic life are widely politicized, people's livelihood, even their economic and physical survival, depends on political and administrative decisions. This result has brought about conflicts... This series of development has shifted people's attention from proctive activities to the political field; The orientation of people's activities must be the key factor of a country's economic performance. ⑨
in a word, external aid is not only not an inevitable requirement for economic development, but also an obstacle to development. ⑩ Moreover, external assistance is the root cause of the North South conflict, not the solution to it&# 91; 11]
in a more general sense, Reagan believers disagree with the relevant view of encircling liberalism, that is, a more prosperous South can promote stability, which is in the interests of the United States. In fact, the South has gained a lot of wealth, but at the expense of the north. Moreover, strategies to contain liberalism have not bought global stability. The containment liberals not only showed indecisive attitude in the decision-making of using force against Vietnam, but actually encouraged the expansion of communism, and appeased the Nationalist forces and the selfish elites of the third world with generous foreign aid policies, while these people were committed to destroying the global economic hegemony of the north
in fact, many members of Reagan's new cabinet firmly believe that the interests of the north and the south are fundamentally opposed, and the current task is to repair the losses by formulating firm policies aimed at repelling the South and re conquering the increasingly unmanageable third world in the world economic system dominated by the United States. In October 1981, Ronald Reagan attended a highly publicized economic summit in Cancun, Mexico, which was expected to usher North South relations into a new stage. However, people later learned that Cancun Conference became the prelude of a global economic counter revolutionary movement in the name of free market. For those Reagan cabinet members who supported the confrontational policy towards the south, the international economic situation in the early 1980s provided a favorable situation for them to take an economic offensive. First of all, although OPEC had a united front on the outside in the second oil price rise in 1979, there was actually a deep division within OPEC in the early 1980s. There are differences between radical Iran and conservative US ally Saudi Arabia. Among them, Iran wants to use oil as a weapon against western countries; There are also differences between countries seeking to maximize income, including Iraq, and countries seeking to maximize market share, such as Saudi Arabia< br />[ 12] In addition, the development and accelerated exploitation of oil fields not under OPEC's control, such as those in the North Sea and Alaska, have significantly weakened OPEC's cartel's control over oil prices
furthermore, in the late 1970s, the United States used diplomatic skills to separate OPEC from the efforts of other third world countries to set up cartels to control the prices of bauxite, tin and other raw materials. In 1975, when the governments of the third world countries flocked to Paris to attend the International Economic Cooperation Conference (CIEC) and confront the north, many countries were full of hope that OPEC's oil procing Congress would stand with them to demand a comprehensive agreement on a large number of commodities. However, Saudi Arabia was bought: in order to repay a batch of US Treasury bonds that Saudi Arabia was allowed to buy, the exact amount of which was kept secret, Saudi Arabia agreed not to use oil prices as a weapon in commodity conflicts. An unspoken working agreement is that Saudi Arabia and other OPEC Arab oil procers are free to determine oil prices as long as oil supply is not disrupted and oil revenues are not used to weaken the existing economic system&# 91; 13] The agreement exposed the weakness behind the ostensible solidarity of the southern countries, and revealed the fact that the interests of the elites of oil procing countries and the instrial and financial elites of the north are more interdependent. Foreign aid policy became the decisive weapon of Reagan administration to restrain the south. For the vast majority of Reaganism believers, it seems that they have already reached this consensus: foreign aid is mainly a political tool, which should be mainly used to consolidate and strengthen the status of the United States in international power politics. In fact, ring the Reagan administration, the real growth of bilateral aid, which is non military but linked to security goals, was more than 80%, while foreign aid for development and food aid declined< br />[ 16] From 1981 to 1986, the five largest recipients of the economic assistance fund were all countries considered to be of strategic significance to the United States: they either had the strategic significance of the anti Communist struggle, such as El Salvador, Pakistan and Turkey, or had the significance of the struggle against the third world, such as Israel and Egypt< According to Reaganism believers, the bilateral aid paid by USAID should be conditional: the free market policy must be implemented, and the aid must be used to help the development of private enterprises in the third world; Others advocate recing the role of the U.S. government in humanitarian assistance and transferring this responsibility to private institutions, because moral responsibility for the world's poor is best left to private and private organizations, rather than government officials&# 91; 17]
in the late 1970s, US foreign aid through multilateral organizations accounted for about one fifth of US foreign aid, which became the most controversial topic. Some reaganists suggest that this kind of foreign aid should be phased out, at least not increased, because the more distant the relationship between the providers and recipients of funds, the more likely the funds will not be used effectively&# 91; 18] As a result, the world bank, with a budget of 12 billion US dollars, has become the primary focus of Reaganism's plan to discipline the south. Although some of them are willing to ask the United States to stop funding because they think this institution is the main promoter of the third world countries' leading economic policies, the pragmatic conservatives of the Ministry of finance are the people who supervise the operation of the world bank. They realize that the world bank is an extremely effective and even core tool for them to discipline the third world countries. Robert McNamara, a classic cold war liberalist, observed the change of the situation and resigned in 1981. With McNamara's resignation and the subsequent withdrawal of his main aides (including the head of the senior planning and project review department, mabub UL HAQ of Pakistan, who is the think tank of the world bank's Poverty Alleviation Policy), the world bank's food and clothing needs program came to an end. In accordance with the long-standing right of the United States to appoint American citizens to the highest post in the world bank, the Reagan administration nominated a docile figure, A. W. (ToM) Clausen, the former president of the Bank of America, to replace McNamara. In the mid-1980s, the position was filled by a better speaker