Is the crdex exchange bitcoin
Publish: 2021-05-27 22:02:10
1. When a user makes a transaction, he can only trade the currency in each transaction account. If he needs to trade the currency in his wallet, he needs to transfer the currency fund in his wallet to the corresponding transaction account, and then he can carry out various transactions. Of course, first of all, you need to have an okex account, and then you can trade bitcoin in legal currency, currency or contract.
2. Okex is the bitcoin trading platform with the largest trading volume in the world. The three major businesses of the platform are legal currency, currency and contract. The proct lines of several other platforms are not as rich as OK, so the three businesses of okex, together, have more trading volume than the sum of other platforms.
3. According to incomplete statistics, there are 166 concepts of
bitcoin, which was first proposed by Nakamoto in 2009. According to Nakamoto's ideas, open source software is designed and released, and P2P network is built on it. Bitcoin is a kind of P2P digital currency. Point to point transmission means a decentralized payment system
unlike most currencies, bitcoin does not rely on specific currency institutions. It is generated by a large number of calculations based on specific algorithms. Bitcoin economy uses a distributed database composed of many nodes in the whole P2P network to confirm and record all transactions, and uses cryptography design to ensure the security of all aspects of currency circulation. The decentralized nature and algorithm of P2P can ensure that it is impossible to artificially manipulate the value of bitcoin through mass proction. The design based on cryptography can make bitcoin only be transferred or paid by the real owner. This also ensures the anonymity of money ownership and circulation transactions. The biggest difference between bitcoin and other virtual currencies is that the total amount of bitcoin is very limited and it has a strong scarcity. The monetary system used to have no more than 10.5 million in four years, after which the total number will be permanently limited to 21 million.
bitcoin, which was first proposed by Nakamoto in 2009. According to Nakamoto's ideas, open source software is designed and released, and P2P network is built on it. Bitcoin is a kind of P2P digital currency. Point to point transmission means a decentralized payment system
unlike most currencies, bitcoin does not rely on specific currency institutions. It is generated by a large number of calculations based on specific algorithms. Bitcoin economy uses a distributed database composed of many nodes in the whole P2P network to confirm and record all transactions, and uses cryptography design to ensure the security of all aspects of currency circulation. The decentralized nature and algorithm of P2P can ensure that it is impossible to artificially manipulate the value of bitcoin through mass proction. The design based on cryptography can make bitcoin only be transferred or paid by the real owner. This also ensures the anonymity of money ownership and circulation transactions. The biggest difference between bitcoin and other virtual currencies is that the total amount of bitcoin is very limited and it has a strong scarcity. The monetary system used to have no more than 10.5 million in four years, after which the total number will be permanently limited to 21 million.
4. I think it's very reliable. Compared with peers in the instry, okex is the world's leading blockchain digital asset trading platform with the largest trading volume in the world. Your adoption is my driving force
5. According to CMC data statistics, there are nearly 300 digital currency transactions currently included, among which the domestic transactions at the top are fire currency, okex, manyuan.com, etc., while the others are overseas exchanges.
6. Yes, you see, the statistics of non trumpet is the first place of okex.
7. Because bitcoin is an electronic currency, even in the same exchange, the price is different every day, and it will change greatly with the fluctuation of the market.
8. This is the best exchange out there, and I think the security and user experience of okex are the best.
9. Yes, it seems that the total trading volume of okex has always been the number one exchange in the world.
10. 1、 The idea of returning to the new gold standard
some economists in developing countries believe that we must return to the track of the gold standard because of the doubts about the so-called "inverted pyramid" of financial assets and physical assets and the "financial hegemony" caused by the substitution of the US dollar for the world currency, The so-called "new gold standard" concept is put forward, that is, all countries in the world join the gold standard countries union at the same time to determine or change the stable relationship between their currencies and gold at the same time. It is said that this not only retains the global welfare enhancement that financial globalization may bring, but also overcomes the capital accumulation and the virtualization of the world economy (Spencer, m; 1995) Economists who hold this idea are not only from developing countries, but also left-wing economists from some developed countries, such as Harold of the United States; 1999) The basic reasons are as follows: 1. As a measure of value, money itself must have value. The current credit currency system can only lead to people's crazy pursuit of pure credit currency and uncontrolled expansion of assets; 2. At present, the amount of gold reserves is huge enough to ensure the stability of gold based currency; 3. The return to the gold standard system also means that the developed countries are deprived of the possibility of squeezing through inflation tax and international seigniorage tax, so the new gold standard is more fair; 4. The gold standard can overcome economic nationalism more effectively. Because the currencies of various countries are actually represented by gold, there is no use of the rise and fall of nominal exchange rate; The reality of national protectionism in trade or Finance & quot; (Shelton, J; 1998)
the Centennial crisis and changes of the monetary system have proved that the return to the gold standard system can hardly solve any problems. 1. Although there have been many regional financial crises since the 1980s, none of them has developed into a global economic recession or even collapse. Historically, the gold standard is not enough to protect the world economy from the threat of inflation or deflation. For example, in ancient Rome, medieval Europe, Spain and Brazil, under the complete gold standard system, inflation with price increase of more than 30 times occurred; However, the world economy broke out in 1879-1896 and 1929-1933 under the gold standard system, and the world economic depression was triggered by the collapse of the financial system (Zhong Wei; 2000) 2. The gold standard system is an astonishing waste of human resources. The more developed the world economy is, the more astonishing the global gold stock needed as a pure trading intermediary (Triffin; 1997) In other words, even if the globalization of financial capital under the gold standard system is fairer, it is doomed to make the global economic growth converge to a limit (the global gold stock that can be used as currency), or collapse to a limit (this means that the development of the world economy collapses e to the extreme lack of gold capital; the global economic growth will collapse e to the extreme lack of gold capital; Or because the progress of human technology can synthesize gold, resulting in the loss of the gold standard foundation and collapse). It is an inevitable historical process for economy to be financialized or virtualized. 3. Human beings have not failed to return to the gold standard, including Britain after the first World War and the United States from 1933 to 1934. For example, in Roosevelt's New Deal period, the United States partially adopted the so-called & quot; Repayment of US dollars & quot This gold standard system allows the official price of gold to be adjusted periodically to stabilize the national price level, that is, when the price falls, the official price of gold will be increased, and when the price rises, the official price of gold will be decreased. At this time, the internationalization of financial capital is actually open to sacrifice the currency stability of other countries in exchange for their own price stability, G & Pearson,F Compared with the current international monetary system, the gold standard has no substantive fairness. The practice of returning to the gold standard in history also shows that it is impossible to try to regain the gold standard which has been abandoned for nearly half a century< Second, the idea of rebuilding the new Bretton Woods system was put forward in the urgent appeal adopted by Schiller Institute and gorks International Labor Committee in riston from February 15 to 17, 1997. The appeal was signed by hundreds of well-known political and academic figures from various countries, including heirg, the founder of Schiller Institute, Natalia, a member of Ukraine's national parliament, including 80 current and former members of the United States, 53 members of the Commonwealth of Independent States, 17 members of Latin America, 35 religious figures, 40 leaders of international trade unions, as well as representatives from Europe and the United States Heads of government and celebrities in Africa and Asia. The Nobel laureate, Alai of France, and the controversial American Lyndon LaRouche (Sanger, D; 1999) < The main contents of the book are as follows: 1. At present, the global financial speculation is rampant and the international financial order is chaotic. The world is facing proction recession and large-scale unemployment. The so-called reform policy enforced by the International Monetary Fund has caused serious social disasters to the former Soviet Union, Eastern European countries and many Latin American and African countries. The whole international financial system is always in danger of collapse, and its political, social and military consequences are unimaginable. 2. As the current international monetary system may threaten the whole human civilization, it is necessary to hold a new Bretton Woods conference urgently. All sovereign countries in the world need to take joint actions to break the international financial system centered on the International Monetary Fund, establish a new international financial order, restructure global debt and restore the fixed currency exchange rate system. The monopoly of international seigniorage by developed countries, which is included in the globalization of financial capital itself, has made peripheral countries become victims, and international financial institutions have no right to ask people's flesh and blood to repay their debts. 2. It is extremely dangerous for us dollar to act as the world currency, "not only for the people of one country, but also for the people of the whole world, we must now try to abolish the financial shackles imposed on them by the international monopoly financial institutions.". Sovereign states have the right to pursue independent anti depression economic policies and provide low-cost long-term credit for large-scale investment in social infrastructure, instry and agriculture. The more extreme proposal to restore the new Bretton Woods system either claims that the world is in a state of emergency to abolish the existing currency (LaRouche, l; Either it calls for the destruction of currency and the reconstruction of the new global managed exchange rate system and the global central bank (Shelton, J; 1994)
the above ideas seem to ignore the historical inevitability and progress of the evolution of the monetary system itself. Whether the distribution of global welfare increment is fair or not caused by financial globalization, it at least leads to the emergence of a global welfare increment; There is nothing wrong with condemning the existing international monetary system and asking for the reconstruction of a new financial order from the perspective of the interests of developing countries and the fairness of the global distribution of capital gains. However, as the current international monetary and economic system is basically a capitalist system monopolized by developed countries, such a system is bound to serve the world economy? quot; It seems that the reform process of the monetary system can hardly be controlled by the developing countries; Appeal & quot; In the new Bretton Woods system< Third, reform of the International Monetary Fund and the world bank. Recently, the reform of the international monetary system is often accompanied by sharp accusations against the International Monetary Fund and the world bank. Therefore, the reform of the international monetary system cannot be separated from the reform of these international financial institutions. The Egyptian economist Samir Amin, as a representative, put forward the idea of reconstructing these international organizations. In view of the fact that this idea often hopes to transform the IMF into a global central bank, its theoretical origin can even be traced back to Hayek's "monetary nationalism and international stability" in 1937 and McKinnon's "international criteria for monetary stability" in 1982 (mekinnon, R; 1984) The reasons are as follows: 1. The original goal of the IMF is to ensure the monetary stability of the open global economy, in order to replace the shaky gold standard system before World War II. However, like the world bank, the IMF is designed to provide comprehensive control for the United States. The United States denies the idea of a global central bank and replaces it with a weaker and dependent IMF to control it and share responsibilities with other countries. 2. Such institutional design makes the IMF unable to force developing countries to implement structural adjustment and prevent them from over borrowing; Nor is it able to demand effective debt relief from the developed countries that manipulate it. 3. Although the IMF pursues the goal of accelerating its return to currency convertibility under the condition of maximum openness, its extremely brutal solution is well known. The IMF has no real authority to stabilize the international monetary system. Other accusations are not limited to the IMF, including the world bank, the WTO, the G7 and the United Nations< Based on the above analysis, Samir Amin believes that the reform plan should include the following contents: 1. Transform the IMF into the world central bank with the right to issue the real world currency, which will replace the US dollar to ensure the stability of exchange rate and provide the developing countries with & quot; Adjust " in the process of growth; The required solvency. 2. Turn the world bank into a fund that can absorb international capital from Germany, Japan, etc., and inject it into developing countries (not the United States). This kind of capital flow regulation, which aims to promote the economic growth of developing countries, will force the United States to rece its huge current account deficit. 3. Review the financial policy coordination among Europe, Japan and the United States, so as to make it move towards the direction of allowing the exchange rate to be relatively stable and forcing the United States to adjust its structural deficit. At the same time, we should rebuild the third world organization according to the regional and global interdependence, so as to eliminate the negative impact of the ongoing global monopolarization. 4. To rebuild the UN system and make it a place for political and economic negotiations, so as to establish a coordination mechanism for financial activities and monetary policy in major regions of the world (Amin; 1995)
the essence of the above ideas reflects the uneasiness of developing countries about the hegemony of the US dollar and the dominance of the international monetary system by developed countries, and the hope that developed countries will share more of the losses of the currency crisis. However, it is obvious that the current international monetary system is in fact a post hegemony system, in which hegemony leads to stability. Behind the monetary system is also a comparison of national strength (Cooper, N; 1989) What developing countries should pay more attention to is perhaps the balance of power and responsibility between powerful and weak countries in the monetary system. How to correctly share more guidance and voice in the international monetary system is still a long way to go< Some economists in developing countries believe that since the disadvantages of the current international monetary system are related to the country's credit currency (especially the US dollar) acting as the world currency, the most direct and bold idea is of course to denationalize the currency. This idea includes two schemes. One is the competitive currency issued by private financial institutions, which completely decouples currency from national credit. Let's take a look at the monetary denationalization and the radical cure of the current financial crisis
some economists in developing countries believe that we must return to the track of the gold standard because of the doubts about the so-called "inverted pyramid" of financial assets and physical assets and the "financial hegemony" caused by the substitution of the US dollar for the world currency, The so-called "new gold standard" concept is put forward, that is, all countries in the world join the gold standard countries union at the same time to determine or change the stable relationship between their currencies and gold at the same time. It is said that this not only retains the global welfare enhancement that financial globalization may bring, but also overcomes the capital accumulation and the virtualization of the world economy (Spencer, m; 1995) Economists who hold this idea are not only from developing countries, but also left-wing economists from some developed countries, such as Harold of the United States; 1999) The basic reasons are as follows: 1. As a measure of value, money itself must have value. The current credit currency system can only lead to people's crazy pursuit of pure credit currency and uncontrolled expansion of assets; 2. At present, the amount of gold reserves is huge enough to ensure the stability of gold based currency; 3. The return to the gold standard system also means that the developed countries are deprived of the possibility of squeezing through inflation tax and international seigniorage tax, so the new gold standard is more fair; 4. The gold standard can overcome economic nationalism more effectively. Because the currencies of various countries are actually represented by gold, there is no use of the rise and fall of nominal exchange rate; The reality of national protectionism in trade or Finance & quot; (Shelton, J; 1998)
the Centennial crisis and changes of the monetary system have proved that the return to the gold standard system can hardly solve any problems. 1. Although there have been many regional financial crises since the 1980s, none of them has developed into a global economic recession or even collapse. Historically, the gold standard is not enough to protect the world economy from the threat of inflation or deflation. For example, in ancient Rome, medieval Europe, Spain and Brazil, under the complete gold standard system, inflation with price increase of more than 30 times occurred; However, the world economy broke out in 1879-1896 and 1929-1933 under the gold standard system, and the world economic depression was triggered by the collapse of the financial system (Zhong Wei; 2000) 2. The gold standard system is an astonishing waste of human resources. The more developed the world economy is, the more astonishing the global gold stock needed as a pure trading intermediary (Triffin; 1997) In other words, even if the globalization of financial capital under the gold standard system is fairer, it is doomed to make the global economic growth converge to a limit (the global gold stock that can be used as currency), or collapse to a limit (this means that the development of the world economy collapses e to the extreme lack of gold capital; the global economic growth will collapse e to the extreme lack of gold capital; Or because the progress of human technology can synthesize gold, resulting in the loss of the gold standard foundation and collapse). It is an inevitable historical process for economy to be financialized or virtualized. 3. Human beings have not failed to return to the gold standard, including Britain after the first World War and the United States from 1933 to 1934. For example, in Roosevelt's New Deal period, the United States partially adopted the so-called & quot; Repayment of US dollars & quot This gold standard system allows the official price of gold to be adjusted periodically to stabilize the national price level, that is, when the price falls, the official price of gold will be increased, and when the price rises, the official price of gold will be decreased. At this time, the internationalization of financial capital is actually open to sacrifice the currency stability of other countries in exchange for their own price stability, G & Pearson,F Compared with the current international monetary system, the gold standard has no substantive fairness. The practice of returning to the gold standard in history also shows that it is impossible to try to regain the gold standard which has been abandoned for nearly half a century< Second, the idea of rebuilding the new Bretton Woods system was put forward in the urgent appeal adopted by Schiller Institute and gorks International Labor Committee in riston from February 15 to 17, 1997. The appeal was signed by hundreds of well-known political and academic figures from various countries, including heirg, the founder of Schiller Institute, Natalia, a member of Ukraine's national parliament, including 80 current and former members of the United States, 53 members of the Commonwealth of Independent States, 17 members of Latin America, 35 religious figures, 40 leaders of international trade unions, as well as representatives from Europe and the United States Heads of government and celebrities in Africa and Asia. The Nobel laureate, Alai of France, and the controversial American Lyndon LaRouche (Sanger, D; 1999) < The main contents of the book are as follows: 1. At present, the global financial speculation is rampant and the international financial order is chaotic. The world is facing proction recession and large-scale unemployment. The so-called reform policy enforced by the International Monetary Fund has caused serious social disasters to the former Soviet Union, Eastern European countries and many Latin American and African countries. The whole international financial system is always in danger of collapse, and its political, social and military consequences are unimaginable. 2. As the current international monetary system may threaten the whole human civilization, it is necessary to hold a new Bretton Woods conference urgently. All sovereign countries in the world need to take joint actions to break the international financial system centered on the International Monetary Fund, establish a new international financial order, restructure global debt and restore the fixed currency exchange rate system. The monopoly of international seigniorage by developed countries, which is included in the globalization of financial capital itself, has made peripheral countries become victims, and international financial institutions have no right to ask people's flesh and blood to repay their debts. 2. It is extremely dangerous for us dollar to act as the world currency, "not only for the people of one country, but also for the people of the whole world, we must now try to abolish the financial shackles imposed on them by the international monopoly financial institutions.". Sovereign states have the right to pursue independent anti depression economic policies and provide low-cost long-term credit for large-scale investment in social infrastructure, instry and agriculture. The more extreme proposal to restore the new Bretton Woods system either claims that the world is in a state of emergency to abolish the existing currency (LaRouche, l; Either it calls for the destruction of currency and the reconstruction of the new global managed exchange rate system and the global central bank (Shelton, J; 1994)
the above ideas seem to ignore the historical inevitability and progress of the evolution of the monetary system itself. Whether the distribution of global welfare increment is fair or not caused by financial globalization, it at least leads to the emergence of a global welfare increment; There is nothing wrong with condemning the existing international monetary system and asking for the reconstruction of a new financial order from the perspective of the interests of developing countries and the fairness of the global distribution of capital gains. However, as the current international monetary and economic system is basically a capitalist system monopolized by developed countries, such a system is bound to serve the world economy? quot; It seems that the reform process of the monetary system can hardly be controlled by the developing countries; Appeal & quot; In the new Bretton Woods system< Third, reform of the International Monetary Fund and the world bank. Recently, the reform of the international monetary system is often accompanied by sharp accusations against the International Monetary Fund and the world bank. Therefore, the reform of the international monetary system cannot be separated from the reform of these international financial institutions. The Egyptian economist Samir Amin, as a representative, put forward the idea of reconstructing these international organizations. In view of the fact that this idea often hopes to transform the IMF into a global central bank, its theoretical origin can even be traced back to Hayek's "monetary nationalism and international stability" in 1937 and McKinnon's "international criteria for monetary stability" in 1982 (mekinnon, R; 1984) The reasons are as follows: 1. The original goal of the IMF is to ensure the monetary stability of the open global economy, in order to replace the shaky gold standard system before World War II. However, like the world bank, the IMF is designed to provide comprehensive control for the United States. The United States denies the idea of a global central bank and replaces it with a weaker and dependent IMF to control it and share responsibilities with other countries. 2. Such institutional design makes the IMF unable to force developing countries to implement structural adjustment and prevent them from over borrowing; Nor is it able to demand effective debt relief from the developed countries that manipulate it. 3. Although the IMF pursues the goal of accelerating its return to currency convertibility under the condition of maximum openness, its extremely brutal solution is well known. The IMF has no real authority to stabilize the international monetary system. Other accusations are not limited to the IMF, including the world bank, the WTO, the G7 and the United Nations< Based on the above analysis, Samir Amin believes that the reform plan should include the following contents: 1. Transform the IMF into the world central bank with the right to issue the real world currency, which will replace the US dollar to ensure the stability of exchange rate and provide the developing countries with & quot; Adjust " in the process of growth; The required solvency. 2. Turn the world bank into a fund that can absorb international capital from Germany, Japan, etc., and inject it into developing countries (not the United States). This kind of capital flow regulation, which aims to promote the economic growth of developing countries, will force the United States to rece its huge current account deficit. 3. Review the financial policy coordination among Europe, Japan and the United States, so as to make it move towards the direction of allowing the exchange rate to be relatively stable and forcing the United States to adjust its structural deficit. At the same time, we should rebuild the third world organization according to the regional and global interdependence, so as to eliminate the negative impact of the ongoing global monopolarization. 4. To rebuild the UN system and make it a place for political and economic negotiations, so as to establish a coordination mechanism for financial activities and monetary policy in major regions of the world (Amin; 1995)
the essence of the above ideas reflects the uneasiness of developing countries about the hegemony of the US dollar and the dominance of the international monetary system by developed countries, and the hope that developed countries will share more of the losses of the currency crisis. However, it is obvious that the current international monetary system is in fact a post hegemony system, in which hegemony leads to stability. Behind the monetary system is also a comparison of national strength (Cooper, N; 1989) What developing countries should pay more attention to is perhaps the balance of power and responsibility between powerful and weak countries in the monetary system. How to correctly share more guidance and voice in the international monetary system is still a long way to go< Some economists in developing countries believe that since the disadvantages of the current international monetary system are related to the country's credit currency (especially the US dollar) acting as the world currency, the most direct and bold idea is of course to denationalize the currency. This idea includes two schemes. One is the competitive currency issued by private financial institutions, which completely decouples currency from national credit. Let's take a look at the monetary denationalization and the radical cure of the current financial crisis
Hot content