Bitcoin case prosecution
With digital currency bitcoin in the spotlight in 2017, it's hard to remember the shadow of other cryptocurrencies
according to a new report, 1000 bitcoin holders have 40% market share
it is said that these major investors, known as "whales", may cause the value of cryptocurrency to plummet at any time
bitcoin once approached the $20000 mark. At the beginning of the year, bitcoin was worth just $970
However, cryptocurrency is very unstable. The value fell below 14000 yuan on December 10 and rose above 16000 yuan on December 11 Moreover, financial experts believe that bitcoin may be more unstable than people think. Recently, some Chinese bitcoin players have taken to court in a rage over losses 
according to the bitcoin player, from November 2013 to June 2016, he paid 321966 yuan to fire coin, withdrawn 104772 yuan from fire coin, and lost 217194 yuan. The losses were caused by the bitcoin and lightcoin exchanges with 20 times leverage through the accounts on bitvc website
because bitvc website does not accept RMB recharge, it only accepts virtual currency recharge, so its transactions on the website are all through the purchase of bitcoin and Leyte coin by recharging cash on fire coin, and then transfer the purchased virtual currency to the account of bitvc website
the bitcoin player also said that although fire coin knows that virtual futures trading is illegal, it still lures registered users of fire coin to enter bitvc website for virtual currency futures trading with 20 times leverage by opening bitvc website and setting up links on fire coin website, using high leverage incement and telephone invitation. Fire money network further through the control of background data, false transactions and other means of fraud, resulting in his damage, so it asked fire money network to compensate for the loss of 52.8567 bitcoin, 815.9731 lightcoin
the court held that the arbitration clause agreed by the bitcoin player and the fire coin company has come into effect, and the ruling is confirmed to be valid. The dispute in this case should be arbitrated by the arbitration organization, and the court has no jurisdiction, so the lawsuit should be rejected
On December 14, according to the Haidian court's official website, a bitcoin player sued huocoin for damages for a loss of 217194 yuan. Haidian court accepted the case a few days ago. Due to the arbitration clause stipulated in the user agreement, the court finally ruled to reject the plaintiff's lawsuit
after the player sues the fire coin fraud and makes a claim, the court considers that if the party applies to the people's court to make a ruling on the validity of the arbitration agreement, it should be under the jurisdiction of the intermediate people's court in the place where the arbitration institution is located
at present, there is no definite legal attribute of bitcoin fund and other financial procts; It is also difficult for investors to see the situation of its controllers, capital pool and risk control, which contains greater risks. The player sues the fire coin net to be rejected, the judge reminds the investor should maintain the full vigilance, must not blindly follow suit. Although the supervision modes of virtual currency are different in different countries, it is the general trend to strengthen the supervision, and virtual currency should be included in the standardized development path. The similar cases of bitcoin players suing fire coin network will be more and more standardized, and investment is risky, so we need to be cautious when entering the market
Zhengzhou couple committed suicide e to the failure of bitcoin investment, which makes people regret. Whether this kind of virtual currency is IQ tax has become a hot topic. This kind of virtual currency is the proct of the development of the times, not IQ tax, but it needs rational investment and can not be taken as the direction of investment the continuous development of Internet technology not only has a profound impact on people's way of life, but also promotes the vigorous development of Internet finance instry. Digital cryptocurrency is widely concerned by investors for its novel architecture design and high price
investors should improve their awareness of risk prevention and take corresponding risk management measures an important feature of cryptocurrency market is that the price fluctuates violently, the market risk is high and the market speculation is serious. With the price risk of digital currency, cryptocurrency also has technical risk and regulatory risk in the face of these risks, investors should be prepared for the corresponding risks before entering the market to improve their anti risk ability. When investors enter the cryptocurrency market, they should not only choose a qualified cryptocurrency platform to improve their ability to resist technical risks, but also do a good job in risk management to avoid investing too much money in the cryptocurrency market< before entering the cryptocurrency market, indivial investors should have a deep understanding of the nature and market environment of cryptocurrency
the patent law stipulates that the scope of protection of a patent right for invention or utility model shall be subject to the content of the claim, and the description and drawings can be used to explain the content of the claim
the interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the application of law in the trial of patent infringement disputes stipulates that the people's court shall examine all the technical features recorded in the claims claimed by the obligee when deciding whether the infringed technical solution falls within the scope of patent protection, The people's court shall determine that it falls within the scope of patent protection; If, compared with all the technical features recorded in the claims, the technical features of the sued infringing technical scheme lack more than one of the technical features recorded in the claims, or more than one of the technical features are not the same or the same, the people's court shall determine that it does not fall into the scope of protection of the patent right
it can be seen from the above provisions that if a proct is identified as infringement in the patent document, it must cover all the technical features recorded in the claim. Therefore, in order to obtain a larger scope of protection, the less content in the claim, the better, that is, do not add unnecessary content
the innovation of blockchain is usually associated with multiple executors, which is a systematic scheme that needs the cooperation of all parties. For example, if the data publishing node, blockchain network, authorization node, etc. are combined in a claim, it will be found that when the patentee wants to sue an executor for infringement, the party does not cover all the contents of the claim (at least not other executors), which leads to that although the party uses the innovative idea of the patent, it does not infringe. Therefore, in a claim, it is better to write the scope of protection around an executor< According to the patent law, except as otherwise provided in this law, no entity or indivial may exploit its patent without the permission of the patentee, that is, it may not manufacture, use, promise to sell, sell or import its patented procts, or use its patented methods, or use, sell or import its patented procts for proction and business purposes Promise to sell, sell and import the procts directly obtained according to the patented method
here we should pay attention to "for the purpose of proction and operation", that is to say, not for the purpose of implementation, no infringement. Therefore, when writing the claims, we should also consider who the potential infringement objects are, and the content of the patent right should limit them as far as possible, instead of including unnecessary objects (such as the devices used by the end consumers).
According to foreign media sources, Craig Wright, who claims to be the "inventor of bitcoin," is now accused of defrauding $5 billion worth of bitcoin and other assets from a computer security expert
Wright, an Australian living in London, has not yet commented. He is also accused of violating his obligation to cooperate with cleman and making himself rich illegally at the expense of his colleagues
on March 9, the company received a report from the public that there might be electricity theft in building 6 of Santai West Hospital, resulting in low power consumption voltage of surrounding residents. After the anti stealing personnel arrived at the scene, they found that the reported area belonged to the old community, and some users had been demolished; The reported households have built walls and closed doors and windows. On March 10, anti stealing officers and police came to the scene again, opened the door of the house, and found that there were nearly 200 sets of equipment inside, which were cooled by blowers. It is determined that the equipment in the house is a "bitcoin digger", which is a computer used to earn bitcoin. It consumes a lot of power when working. After on-site inspection, the household was privately connected to 380 V three-phase four wire power supply, and the measured current reached 200 amperes, which was a serious electricity stealing behavior. At present, the case is being followed up
bitcoin, Ruitai coin, Laite coin and other digital cryptocurrencies may be used by pyramid schemes.
“ The biggest case in the coin Circle & quot; The second instance of plustoken case is in Jiangsu & middot; Yancheng sentence. The case involved more than 2 million participants, more than 3000 levels of hierarchical relationship, and the total value of digital currency involved exceeded 40 billion yuan
Yancheng intermediate people's Court of Jiangsu Province issued a criminal ruling of second instance, rejecting the appeal and maintaining the original judgment. According to the judgment of the first instance, 14 defendants, including Chen Bo, Ding zanqing and Peng Yixuan, committed the crime of organizing and leading pyramid selling activities, and Chen Tao, who committed the crime of covering up and concealing the crime, was sentenced to two to eleven years' imprisonment and a fine
At the beginning of the 19th century, Yancheng public security organs received a report that some people used plutoken network platform to commit pyramid selling crimes, and Yancheng public security organs put the suspects on file for investigationunder the coordination of the Ministry of public security, the special case police officers went to Vanuatu, Kampuchea, Vietnam, Malaysia and other countries and regions, and successfully arrested 27 suspect suspects who were hiding abroad. Meanwhile, 1 suspect suspects were arrested in the territory. p>
in the past 20 years, the Ministry of public security deployed the national public security organs to arrest all 82 key members suspected of pyramid selling